Small sociology based on events

"Nizam" always very interesting error "top", even despite the fact that in place of upper did used the same way. Example the case of Igrok. However, the idea of "dictatorship of the proletariat" educated person seems absurd, because the concept "dictatorship of the proletariat" is nothing but "command the slaves". Any, even the most tolerant and liberal society should have a totalitarian ruler, for to keep order in such a society even more difficult.

There are three class: Elite, middle class, lower classes. The essence of any revolution is to 3 rules:
    the
  1. Middle class promises Nizam "bright future" and the power
  2. the
  3. the lower classes are conducted with middle-class overthrow the elite
  4. Now the former elite to take place of middle class and former middle class — elite


And then everything from the beginning. But the point is that the lower classes remain in place. They are a tool.

Our administration is much more tolerant than I could be. I have been on many forums and seen many despotic administrators. We rescued the system of karma, it allows you to avoid Abid and delete controversial posts. In any case, we're just users and if they wish, Futureco, all of us here are banned forever. And they will be right.

Conclusion: I am for "government". I don't want stupid revolutions. Habrahabr is a social media and not a "virtual society of revolutionaries". I wish that everything remains as before. And the administration proposes to remove from the igroka ban, but to reduce his karma. Ban the legislation does not described, so we have to fight karma. If it is good. The revolution will be, as we have in the country: run-jump-shout, the result will not achieve anything, but the resource will collapse.

PS: goodbye karma.
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru

Комментарии

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

Car navigation in detail

PostgreSQL: Analytics for DBA

Google has launched an online training course advanced search